Launch of Distance Education in University of Haripur: Its Rationale, Significance and Challenges

Asaf Niwaz

Abstract


This study was initiated to conceptualize the concept of distance mode of learning and its possible initiative at university of Haripur with special reference to its rationale, significance and challenges. 23 Tutors and 57 students of Teachers’ training programs offered by Allama Iqbal Open University (AIOU), Islamabad, Sarhad University of Science and Technology (SUIT) Peshawar and University of Peshawar were consulted. Respondents of the study were interviewed and asked about the students support services of universities regarding workshops, provision of course text books, assessment of their assignments and papers, professionalism of their respective tutors, and the way university deal with their issues about rechecking of papers, fee submission, issuance of their detail mark sheets and degrees. At the end they were asked what their views are if university of Haripur takes this initiative of launching programs through distance mode of learning. Study revealed that most of the students were not satisfied with students support services of universities; they had very serious concerns about tutors, resource persons of the workshops, rude behavior of staff etc.  It was concluded that these universities had not responsible focal persons and professional tutors in the district to facilitate their students. It was recommended on the basis of results that universities must standardize their students support services and university of Haripur must start distance learning programs for the students of district. 


Full Text:

PDF HTML MP3

References


Allen M., Mabry E., Mattrey M., Bourhis J., Titsworth S. & Burrell N. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis. International Communication Association.

Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2004). Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004.Wellesley, MA: Sloan Consortium.

Berg Z. L., Muilenburg L.Y. & Haneghan J.V. (2002). Barriers to distance education and training. Survey Results. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), 409-418.

Dillon C.L. & Walsh S.M. (1992). Faculty: The neglected resource in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 3 (6), 5-21.

Dooley K. Patil B. & Lineberger R.D. (2000). An evaluation of a multidisciplinary course delivered at a distance: Prescriptive principles to challenge our profession. San Diego, CA: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Agricultural Education Research Conference (ERIC Document Reproduction No. 449 351).

Edwards R. (1995). Different discourses, discourses of difference: Globalization, distance education and open learning. Distance Education, 16(2), 241–255.

Flowers J. (2001). Online learning needs in technology education. Journal of Technology Education. 13(1), 17-30.

Franklin N. & Kaufman D. (1999). Transforming faculty for distance learning. Proceeding of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, USA 15, 271-274.

Furst-Bowe J. (2001). Identifying the needs of adult women in distance learning program. International Journal of Instructional Media, 28 (4).

Galusha J. (1998). Barriers to learning in distance education. Hattiesburg, MS: The University of Southern Mississippi. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 416 377).

Hall J. (1996). The convergence of means. Education Review, 30(4), 42-45.

Harroff P.A. (2002). Dimensions of quality for web-based adult education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Georgia.

Jung I. (2005). ICT-Pedagogy Integration in Teacher Training: Application Cases Worldwide. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (2), 94-101.

Keegan D. (1996). The foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London: Croom Helm.

Lawrence O.H.(2005). A Review of Distance Learning Influences on Adult Learners: Advantages and Disadvantages. California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA. Proceedings of the 2005 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference

Monolescu D, Schifter C. & Greenwood L. (2004). The Distance Education Evolution: Issues and Case Studies. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA.

Moor M.G. (1973). Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 44, 661-679.

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Wadsworth Publishing Company, USA:

Neighbors L.S. (2004). Apart but a Part in Adult Distance Study: Persistence in an Online Cohort Graduate Certificate Program. (Doctoral Dissertation, university of Wisconsin 2004). dissertation Abstract International.

Patrick A. D. & Abdurehman U. (2010). Teacher Education through open and distance learning. Common wealth of Learning: Vancouver: Canada.

Perraton H. (2010). Teacher Education: The Role of Open and Distance Learning. Commonwealth of Learning. British Columbia: Canada.

Perraton, H. (1988). A theory for distance education. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education: International perspectives, 34–45. New York: Routledge.

Picciano A. G. (2001). Distance Learning (making connections across virtual space and time), Prentice-Hall. Inc, New Jersey. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(2), 143-156.

Picciano A., & Seaman, J. (2007). K–12 online learning: A survey of U.S. school district administrators. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.

Saud M.S., Shu'aibu B., Yahya N. & Yasin A. (2011). Effective integration of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in technical and vocational education and training (TVET) toward knowledge management in the changing world of work. African Journal of Business Management. 5(16), 6668-6673.

Schlosser L. & Simonson, M. (2006). Distance education: Definition and glossary of terms (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

Simonson M. (2002). In case you are asked: Effectiveness of distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), vii–ix.

Simonson M. (2006). Teaching courses online. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(4), vii–viii.

Simonson M. (2007). Virtual schools. Distance Learning, 4(1), 76.

Tas E.M. (2010). ICT education for development- a case study. Procedia Social Behavior and Science. Elsevier Ltd. 3, 507-512.

UNESCO. (2002). Teacher Education Guidelines using Open and Distance learning. Paris: France

Van-Dusen G.C. (2000). Digital dilemma: Issues of access, cost, and quality in media-enhanced and distance education. Washington, D.C: Office of Education Research and Improvement (ERIC document Reproduction No. 443371).

Verduin, J. R., & Clark, T. A. (1991). Distance education: The foundations of effective practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Wahlstrom, C., Williams, B. K., & Shea, P. (2003). The successful distance learning student. Belmont, CA: Scratchgravel Publishing Services, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Wolcott L. (1999). Assessing faculty beliefs about rewards and incentives in distance education. Pilot study results. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (ERIC Document Reproduction No. 435271).

World Economic Forum. (2009). World Economic Forum’s Global Information Technology Report 2009. Retrieved from http://www.weforum.org/ pdf/gitr/ 2009/gitr09full report.pdf

Yap K. (1996). Distance education in the Pacific Northwest: Program benefits and implementation barriers. New York: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. 395 563).

Zielinski D. (2000). Can you keep learners online? Training, 37 (3), 64-75.

Zirkle C. (2002). Identification of distance education barriers for trade and industrial teacher education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 40 (1), 20-44.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning