The Effect of Interactive Sessions on the Academic Performance of Students in E-Learning Institutions of Pakistan

Darakhshan Zahid

Abstract


The current practices in E-learning institutes involve online video lecturers and student interaction with teachers by means of Moderate Discussion Board. Ever since the educational institutes/universities of Pakistan embarked on its mission of providing education by means of e-Learning, it has been accepted that some form of interaction between student and lecturer was needed to supplement the published study material. The e-learning institutions of Pakistan are trying to full fill the desire of students for the need of student-teacher interactions. For this purpose they have recently started different interactive session like audio-video interactive sessions using the technology/software based from time to time.

      This study is conducted to evaluate the effect of audio-video interactive session between the students and teachers on the students’ academic performances in e-learning universities/institutes in Pakistan. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agboola, B.A., (1993). Contact Session in Distance Education: An Asset as well as a Burden. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 2(1), pp.17–22.

Banks, F. et al., (2007). Costing Open and Distance Teacher Education. Case Study Examples from Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. Closer Academic Ties. 1975. Unisa News-Nuus, 2(2), p.1.

Chen, H. (2002). Towards an Understanding of Interactions in Distance Education, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 58-71.

Fourie, L.J., (1974). Korrespondensie-kontak en Ander Kontak-vorme. Unisa Bulletin, 9(3), p.8.

Holden, A. M. (1995). The effects of meta cognitive advice and control of sequence on student achievement and attitude toward computer-assisted instruction and content.

Maree, D.H., (1949). Studentebedrywighede Gedurende die Vakansieskool 1949. Die Eksterne Student/The External Student, 3, pp.44–45.

McKenzie, J., Pelliccione, N. & Parker, N., (2009). What Makes Blended Learning Effective? An Interactive Session of Peer Review. In Same Places, Different Spaces Proceedings Ascilite Auckland 2009. pp.1–4. Available at: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/McKenzie-interactivesession.pdf.

Moore, M. G., Thompson, M. M., Quigley, A., Clark, C., & Goff, G. (1990). The Effects of Distance Learning: A Summary of theLiterature. Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA.Precel, K., Eshet-Alkalai, Y. & Alberton, Y., 2009. Pedagogical and Design Aspects of a Blended Learning Course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2), pp.1–16.

Schuemer, R. (1993). Some Psychological Aspects of Distance Education.

Vencatachellum, I. & Munusami, V., (2003). Effectiveness of blended learning at University of Mauritius: The case of the VCILT. In International Conference on Open and Online Learning.

Willis, B., (1993). Distance education: A practical guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning